Asus G11CD-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemAsus G11CD-K  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G11CD-K
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateApr 14 '23 at 14:58
Run Duration342 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 74
1-Core 107
2-Core 196
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 551
55% 446 Pts
64-Core 551
34% 551 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 203B) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.8% Poor
Lighting 31.3
Reflection 32.5
Parallax 31.4
26% 31.7 fps
MRender 35.4
Gravity 31.6
Splatting 22.2
24% 29.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
818GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 439
Write 84.1
Mixed 116
46% 213 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 22.3
87% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 78.9
DQ Mixed 107
86% 124 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 128%
Sabrent SSHD 240GB
73GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 384
Write 105
Mixed 12.5
36% 167 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 22.5
78% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 47.9
63% 114 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
234GB free
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 149
Write 142
Mixed 74.7
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 4TB
933GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 142
Write 134
Mixed 19.9
114% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.9
50% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 53%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
415GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 66.6
Write 74.9
Mixed 60.1
87% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
172% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 64%
Seagate Desktop 500GB
60GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 37.4
Write 38.5
Mixed 28.3
44% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1
75% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.1
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 11.4
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G11CD-K Builds (Compare 1,766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus G11CD-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback