Asus GL502VM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus GL502VM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL502VM
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '23 at 13:20
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 82
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 172
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 435
44% 359 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1550) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.7% Average
Lighting 56.9
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 59
46% 61.5 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 59.1
Splatting 60.9
50% 61.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
890GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,717
Write 1,672
Mixed 1,473
362% 1,621 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 81.3
4K Mixed 49.7
167% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 673
DQ Write 406
DQ Mixed 613
437% 564 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 300%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
112GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 76.8
Write 87
Mixed 23.2
45% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 75%
BUFFALO USB Flash Disk 124GB
25GB free, PID 023a
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 123
Write 8.2
Mixed 10.4
37% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 1.47 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3E1 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
69.5% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 20.7
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 19.8
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL502VM Builds (Compare 290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Asus GL502VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback