HP Laptop 15-bs0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemHP Laptop 15-bs0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 832B
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190304
Uptime129.7 Days
Run DateApr 14 '23 at 12:53
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
37.3% Below average
Memory 36.1
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 144
48% 88.5 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 226
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 227
14% 227 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 832B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.32% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 6.6
5% 5.73 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.5
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.32%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$45
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 330 308 311 318 320 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 422
Write 364
Mixed 283
SusWrite 307
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 35.3
106% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 247
205% 297 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 128%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
273GB free
Firmware: AX1R4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 110 108 110 109 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 96.8
Write 103
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 108
62% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 859B CB8GS2400.C8ET 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
62.4% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 20.2
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 19.8
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 221
18% 221 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-bs0xx Builds (Compare 3,737 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-bs0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback