Eluktronics N170RD1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
20 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemEluktronics N170RD1  (all builds)
MotherboardEluktronics N170RD1
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '23 at 05:19
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 165
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 358
39% 310 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
Clevo(1558 1702) 2GB
CLim: 1222 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 20
17% 19.7 fps
MRender 23.1
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 16.7
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TRO-2280-128-PRO 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0628A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 140 149 154 156 156 MB/s
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.9% Average
Read 283
Write 134
Mixed 121
SusWrite 148
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 8.9
62% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 55.6
63% 105 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 55%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
669GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 120 119 119 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 127
Write 124
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 119
72% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown J641GU42J5213N0 1315 CT8G4SFS824A.C8FBD1 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 18.7
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N170RD1 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Eluktronics N170RD1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback