HP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT15-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT15-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 89EB
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220729
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 14 '23 at 01:21
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$161
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Memory 78.4
1-Core 162
2-Core 310
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 893
95% 760 Pts
64-Core 1,467
91% 1,467 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
HP(103C 88D4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 175
Parallax 168
149% 175 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 137
Splatting 118
118% 148 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1006 512GB
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,896
Write 1,332
Mixed 1,603
358% 1,611 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 49.2
162% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,020
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 789
555% 718 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 413%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
842GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 117
Write 136
Mixed 72.7
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP37D4U1S8MR-8XR 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.2% Excellent
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 29.1
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 37.2
SC Mixed 28.4
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT15-0xxx Builds (Compare 870 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 172%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT15-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $500
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback