TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7817
MotherboardMSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817)  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '23 at 22:52
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 109
2-Core 193
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 527
52% 428 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 72.1%
 Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
MSI(1462 809D)
CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 26.4
16% 24.4 fps
MRender 26.6
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 15
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 16.4%
 Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 99 69 68 69 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
76% Very good
Read 469
Write 273
Mixed 320
SusWrite 91.6
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 31.8
128% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 180
164% 249 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑
This bench: 76%
 Great: 94%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
404GB free
Firmware: AM0Q6E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 108 107 107 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 113
Write 114
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 107
67% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑
This bench: 63.1%
 Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 99U5471-052.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 17
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 25% ↑
This bench: 52%
 Great: 64%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical H81M-P33 (MS-7817) Builds (Compare 5,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817) - $73

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel  $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples905x
Core i5-4590Intel  $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples435x
Core i7-4790Intel  $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples392x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples373x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples297x
GTX 750-TiNvidia  $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples281x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples194x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston  $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples155x
A400 120GBKingston  $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples103x
RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples120x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples90x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples64x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback