Dell Inspiron 7577

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Inspiron 7577  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0P9G3M
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220318
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateApr 13 '23 at 20:58
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 182
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 340
44% 332 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
Dell(1028 0802) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3141
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.7% Average
Lighting 49.6
Reflection 90.2
Parallax 54.3
40% 64.7 fps
MRender 65.2
Gravity 52.5
Splatting 56.1
47% 57.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,194
Write 1963
Mixed 1,442
415% 1,866 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 58.6
190% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 822
DQ Write 698
DQ Mixed 760
569% 760 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
120GB free
Firmware: SDM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 94 95 96 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 47.8
Write 78.8
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 94.7
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.4
155% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFD824A.C16FBD2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.5% Very good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 24.8
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 17.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Inspiron 7577 Builds (Compare 3,034 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Inspiron 7577

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $251Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback