Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '23 at 14:53
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 94.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 196
80% 135 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 491
51% 411 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
Asus(1043 05E3) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.1
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
110% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 140
Parallax 237
94% 164 fps
MRender 225
Gravity 122
Splatting 190
147% 179 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 110%
Great: 116%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 420 433 390 179 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 455
Mixed 369
SusWrite 323
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 41.9
140% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 351
266% 359 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 99%
Great: 124%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
352GB free
Firmware: S5Z44106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1097 676 641 655 653 656 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,692
Write 1,451
Mixed 1,276
SusWrite 730
288% 1,287 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 63
204% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 932
DQ Write 463
DQ Mixed 369
362% 588 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 207%
Great: 311%
WD WD10EACS-07D6B1 1TB
316GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 53 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 66.9
Write 66.8
Mixed 51.6
SusWrite 52.3
44% 59.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 48%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
494GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 80 73 85 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 78.4
Write 72.7
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 79.2
49% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 33
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 29.5
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 58.1
69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 103%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $867
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback