TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemHP
MotherboardHP 8478
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '23 at 09:40
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 201
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 520
56% 445 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 72.9%
 Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8478) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.38% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 28.9
Parallax 5.3
4% 12.9 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 8
6% 6.7 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 4.38%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256S3G 256GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 217 186 188 173 178 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 410
Write 361
Mixed 346
SusWrite 188
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 31
101% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 264
214% 304 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 73.8%
 Great: 98%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
262GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 119 119 117 118 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 76.9
Write 79.2
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 118
53% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 55.8%
 Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 029E CMSX8GX4M1A2666C18 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.3% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 18.8
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 19.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 62.3%
 Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback