Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 213E
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180124
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 13 '23 at 09:08
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	KEN-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281 64,450 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	Memory 30.9 1-Core 41.5 2-Core 73 28% 48.5 Pts	4-Core 102 8-Core 90.1 13% 96.2 Pts	64-Core 88.6 6% 88.6 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 56%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SN6S-256G-1006 256GB 4,074 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: X3511006 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 381 Write 328 Mixed 221 69% 310 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 30.5 4K Mixed 20.5 68% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 258 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 149 128% 190 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8MTF51264HSZ-1G6E2 Hynix HMT851S6AMR6R-PB 8GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile)	21.9% Poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 8.2 23% 7.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 6.6 17% 6.03 GB/s	Latency 250 16% 250 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	24x
HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 6,906 samples	1x

SSD
X110 SATA M.2 256GBSanDiskBench 76%, 2,150 samples	11x
IT L8T-256L9G-HP 256GBLiteonBench 81%, 601 samples	3x
860 EVO M.2 500GBSamsungBench 101%, 35,237 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173QHY-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 94 samples	5x
HMT451B6AFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173QHY-YK0 8GBHynixBench 48%, 173 samples	5x
M471B5173QHY-YK0 Micron 8KTS51264HDZ-1G6E1 8GBSamsungBench 47%, 36 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16