Asus G750JM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemAsus G750JM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JM
Memory18.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '23 at 01:22
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 73.8
1-Core 87
2-Core 168
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 439
45% 364 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 157D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 6.6
3% 9 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 338 314 337 303 233 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 440
Write 320
Mixed 278
SusWrite 309
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 31.4
108% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 258
218% 317 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 128%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
697GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 94 92 94 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 100
Write 69.3
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 92.9
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GRSL Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 0420 F3-1600C9-8GRSL Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 13.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 15.1
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G750JM Builds (Compare 474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $510
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback