Default string be filled by O.E.M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardDefault string be filled by O.E.M  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220401
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 12 '23 at 23:57
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10885H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 61
1-Core 66.6
2-Core 136
51% 88 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 412
40% 330 Pts
64-Core 630
39% 630 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 95%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Walram 2TB 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN06306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 470 475 470 508 519 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 1,052
Write 1,131
Mixed 989
SusWrite 488
206% 915 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 26.6
88% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 296
213% 273 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 111%
Great: 284%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown-2G3B1 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.5% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 10.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 5.8
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string be filled by O.E.M Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Default string be filled by O.E.M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback