HP Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81FF
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '23 at 20:43
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Memory 29.4
1-Core 61
2-Core 118
37% 69.5 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 196
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 81FF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.52% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 6.1
5% 5.77 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.52%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03200001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 43 51 50 55 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 376
Write 336
Mixed 215
SusWrite 56.5
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 17.2
39% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 61.1
DQ Mixed 33.9
44% 81.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
180GB free
Firmware: AX1R4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 77 82 82 82 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 86.5
Write 84.7
Mixed 32
SusWrite 80.9
52% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO4GX4M1A2133C15 Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 11.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 258
16% 258 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 36%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback