Asus G750JH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G750JH  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JH
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '23 at 18:05
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 161
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 426
44% 353 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780M
Asus(1043 213E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 849 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Lighting 28
Reflection 28
Parallax 36.8
23% 30.9 fps
MRender 36.6
Gravity 36.1
Splatting 28
27% 33.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC81605
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 433
Write 366
Mixed 260
78% 353 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 23.6
89% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 165
165% 266 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 101%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77
128GB free
Firmware: JF4OA200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 67 68 66 68 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 57.4
Write 61.9
Mixed 37
SusWrite 66.3
41% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-155.A00LF Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 9905428-155.A00LF Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.4% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 16.2
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G750JH Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus G750JH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback