Asus P8Q67-M-DO-USB3/TPM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Q67-M-DO-USB3/TPM  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '23 at 02:09
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 145
66% 107 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 278
38% 279 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
AMD(1002 C580) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.3.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
11% Very poor
Lighting 13.5
Reflection 21.2
Parallax 18.6
11% 17.8 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 10.5
11% 13.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 11%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RZX-19SSD6G/120GB 120GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RZK1903B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 305
Write 306
Mixed 211
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 17.6
83% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 1.2
20% 45.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 99%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
81GB free
Firmware: ES12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 105 108 109 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 65.3
Write 74.4
Mixed 46.1
SusWrite 107
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DATEN 4G3D33 L0312 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Q67-M-DO-USB3/TPM Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Q67-M-DO-USB3/TPM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback