Supermicro C9X299-PGF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro C9X299-PGF  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro C9X299-RPGF
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191122
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 11 '23 at 09:01
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon (Cascadelake)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 66.4
1-Core 57.3
2-Core 162
54% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 843
75% 633 Pts
64-Core 870
54% 870 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37AB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 198
Reflection 177
Parallax 215
161% 197 fps
MRender 222
Gravity 194
Splatting 158
153% 191 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 147%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 161GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 277 324 245 193 201 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 78%
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB
82GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 408 372 406 482 467 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 51% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 62.8
MC Mixed 42.4
140% 48.9 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 118%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C9X299-PGF Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 166%
UFO

System: Supermicro C9X299-PGF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,538
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback