Notebook P377SM-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory22GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 22GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemNotebook P377SM-A  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P377SM-A
Memory17.2 GB free of 22 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '23 at 02:53
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PSE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
U40, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 185
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 452
46% 375 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M
Clevo(1558 0376) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.9% Good
Lighting 87.5
Reflection 60.8
Parallax 43.6
71% 64 fps
MRender 54.5
Gravity 50.8
Splatting 45.4
41% 50.2 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54
633GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 156 5.5 6.2 6.1 6.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 457
Write 431
Mixed 393
SusWrite 89.9
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 74
4K Mixed 24.5
114% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 39.5
93% 189 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$34
662GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 65 64 65 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 85.1
Write 68.9
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 64.2
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Kingston 99U5428-078.A00LF M471B5773DH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5428-078.A00LF 22GB
1600, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.2% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 14.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 14
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P377SM-A Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Notebook P377SM-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback