Jetway I61M2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardJetway I61M2  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '23 at 02:29
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 168
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 281
39% 288 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460 SE
Gainward(10B0 0401) 768MB
CLim: 648 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 768MB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.36% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 11.4
9% 12.7 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 12
Splatting 10.6
10% 12.9 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.36%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qnix 128GB 128GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G5A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 209 210 230 231 233 MB/s
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.9% Above average
Read 226
Write 203
Mixed 201
SusWrite 218
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 28.1
94% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 95.3
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 144
109% 143 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 83%
SAMSUNG SP2514N 250GB
72GB free, PID 6830
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 17 17 16 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 55.7
Write 8
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 16.3
26% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
9% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical I61M2 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Jetway I61M2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback