Lenovo 30E0003LLM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemLenovo 30E0003LLM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1046
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201113
Uptime15.3 Days
Run DateApr 10 '23 at 20:47
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX 12-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 69.9
1-Core 144
2-Core 278
87% 164 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 1,113
99% 836 Pts
64-Core 2,144
133% 2,144 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2200
Nvidia(10DE 131B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1746 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.2% Average
Lighting 53.1
Reflection 96.9
Parallax 56.6
43% 68.9 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 56.4
Splatting 63.7
52% 63.7 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 1TB SSD 1TB
568GB free
Firmware: V1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2491 2498 2506 2503 1466 400 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
322% Outstanding
Read 1,413
Write 2,575
Mixed 1,614
SusWrite 1,977
431% 1,894 MB/s
4K Read 64.5
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 86.5
302% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,322
DQ Write 1,010
DQ Mixed 915
752% 1,082 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 322%
Great: 483%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
777GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 31 35 22 36 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 157
Write 170
Mixed 85.1
SusWrite 48.6
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GR7CJR8N-XN 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 19.3
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 19.7
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback