Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	27.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard EasyNote TM85 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard EasyNote TM85
Memory	0.5 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100422
Uptime	28.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 10 '23 at 14:41
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	69%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 330 14,119 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Memory 64.2 1-Core 35.1 2-Core 27.2 32% 42.2 Pts	4-Core 40 8-Core 35.5 5% 37.8 Pts	64-Core 41.7 3% 41.7 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 43%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3H01103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 173 84 62 54 62 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.4% Poor	Read 179 Write 159 Mixed 88.2 SusWrite 99.2 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 22 4K Mixed 8.4 42% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 24.3 DQ Write 52.7 DQ Mixed 13.2 17% 30.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F EBJ10UE8BDS0-AE-F 3GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 7.4 18% 6.4 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 1 4% 1.43 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 420MNvidiaBench 2%, 1,922 samples	20x
GeForce GT 320MNvidiaBench 1%, 1,680 samples	18x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	8x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
S280 1TBKingdianBench 85%, 769 samples	2x

RAM
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 29%, 3,134 samples	6x
EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 2x2GBElpidaBench 28%, 1,570 samples	4x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16