TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 843B
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 09 '23 at 14:13
Run Duration61 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 92.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 239
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 642
71% 558 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 89.5%
 Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
HP(103C 8556) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.4% Very good
Lighting 94.9
Reflection 92.8
Parallax 85.9
77% 91.2 fps
MRender 97.7
Gravity 86.9
Splatting 72.7
69% 85.8 fps
Poor: 70% ↑
This bench: 74.4%
 Great: 81%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6JJR8N-VK 859B CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
84% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 24.6
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 32.9
SC Mixed 18.3
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 77% ↑
This bench: 84%
 Great: 89%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-0xxx Builds (Compare 1,117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-0xxx

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel  $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples837x
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD  $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples124x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD  $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples43x
GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia  $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples841x
Radeon RX 580AMDBench 41%, 6,488 samples54x
RX 550AMD  $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples35x
SSD
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples318x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 152%, 17,295 samples134x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples100x
RAM
HMA81GU6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 44%, 1,972 samples113x
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 7,517 samples76x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples74x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback