Zotac ZBOX-CI620/CI640/CI660

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemZotac ZBOX-CI620/CI640/CI660  (all builds)
MotherboardZOTAC ZBOX-CI620/CI640/CI660
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 09 '23 at 12:04
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 200
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 497
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Intel(8086 2015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.04% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 7.4
5% 6.83 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 0.2
4% 6.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.04%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF256GMCS 256GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FSTAN103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 306 329 313 329 329 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 428
Write 408
Mixed 404
SusWrite 318
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 32.3
96% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 332
247% 327 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.3% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 20.1
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 19.4
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBOX-CI620/CI640/CI660 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Zotac ZBOX-CI620/CI640/CI660

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback