Asrock Z690M-ITX/ax

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	82.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z690M-ITX/ax (all builds)
Memory	28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 09 '23 at 06:15
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-12100F-$85 11,860 User benchmarks, average bench 94% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Memory 79.5 1-Core 170 2-Core 314 101% 188 Pts	4-Core 552 8-Core 773 83% 662 Pts	64-Core 771 48% 771 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3702) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.4% Excellent	Lighting 102 Reflection 113 Parallax 104 83% 106 fps	MRender 94.1 Gravity 107 Splatting 97.1 81% 99.5 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung XP941 PCIe M.2 256GB 1,434 User benchmarks, average bench 133% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: UXM6501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 953 Write 673 Mixed 434 151% 687 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 99.8 4K Mixed 40.2 149% 56.4 MB/s	DQ Read 481 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 237 209% 319 MB/s
Poor: 86% Great: 160%
Apple MI256 251GB 85GB free Firmware: E201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 127 124 132 130 126 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.2% Above average	Read 236 Write 123 Mixed 160 SusWrite 126 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 73.8 4K Mixed 11.5 97% 37.9 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 88.7 87% 142 MB/s

Apple TS256A 251GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 123GB free Firmware: AGAA0205 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 169 175 172 184 170 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 202 Write 163 Mixed 135 SusWrite 174 38% 169 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 44.7 4K Mixed 14.8 61% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 10.4 DQ Write 48 DQ Mixed 17.1 17% 25.2 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF3600C18D4/16GX 2x16GB 12,541 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 31.5 MC Mixed 28.7 87% 30.3 GB/s	SC Read 20.5 SC Write 31.7 SC Mixed 24.2 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 81.5 49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z690M-ITX/ax Builds (Compare 1,189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 160%

UFO

Desktop 111%

UFO

Workstation 164%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z690M-ITX/ax

CPU
Core i5-12600KIntel $174Bench 109%, 101,563 samples	294x
Core i7-12700KIntel $230Bench 114%, 78,749 samples	147x
Core i5-13600KIntel $260Bench 122%, 27,559 samples	109x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	127x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	105x
RTX 3080Nvidia $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	95x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $105Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	100x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $99Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	76x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $160Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	63x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 90%, 101,975 samples	76x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 86,372 samples	74x
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GBTeamBench 91%, 12,641 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $779

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16