Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

15 months ago, 14 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Memory 83.9 1-Core 62.7 2-Core 106 54% 84.1 Pts	4-Core 135 8-Core 154 19% 145 Pts	64-Core 159 10% 159 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 154E) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 531.41 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48% Average	Lighting 57.1 Reflection 68.2 Parallax 60 46% 61.8 fps	MRender 64.7 Gravity 60.2 Splatting 61.7 51% 62.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1002 128GB 3,521 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6103002 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 342 Write 249 Mixed 195 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 34.1 4K Mixed 25.6 81% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 301 DQ Write 209 DQ Mixed 184 156% 231 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 85%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 267GB free Firmware: SDM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 59 60 60 61 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 66.1 Write 117 Mixed 56.3 SusWrite 59.4 55% 74.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.3 159% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 859B CB8GS2400.C8D 16GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	62.2% Good	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 21.7 65% 22.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 18.5 SC Mixed 16.1 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 73.5 54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 77%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	209x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	198x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	406x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1x

SSD
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples	68x
SD9SN8W128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 3,521 samples	46x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	45x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	78x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	68x
76.D305G.D390B 1x16GBUnknownBench 41%, 6,956 samples	25x