Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-K  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190301
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 08 '23 at 15:57
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$45
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 63
2-Core 94
45% 72.8 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 96
14% 101 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
1.86% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.2
2% 1.4 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 0.3
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.86%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 46 3 12 68 63 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.2% Poor
Read 221
Write 175
Mixed 100
SusWrite 60.7
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 16.1
4K Mixed 8.2
34% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 67.9
DQ Write 36.4
DQ Mixed 30.2
28% 44.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 53%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
742GB free
Firmware: SDM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 107 128 133 138 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 12.7
Write 140
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 126
52% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0
91% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax GLLF62F-DA---------- 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
22.1% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 5.9
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 6,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback