Supermicro X11DAC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics73.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
18 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemSupermicro X11DAC  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11DAC
Memory244.7 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221027
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateApr 08 '23 at 04:31
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8160
CPU1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 210
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 796
72% 606 Pts
64-Core 3,955
245% 3,955 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
XFX(1682 9C30) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.5% Very good
Lighting 91.8
Reflection 102
Parallax 141
75% 112 fps
MRender 87.5
Gravity 106
Splatting 72.3
71% 88.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 85%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3512G 512GB
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6107000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 481
Write 436
Mixed 256
87% 391 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 33.6
112% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 278
224% 317 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40BB2-CTD 16x16GB
16 of 16 slots used
256GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81% Excellent
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 33.9
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6.5
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 75 26.9" 1280 720 HPN3716 HP M27fq QHD
Typical X11DAC Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro X11DAC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback