Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2276M 1,872 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 75.6 1-Core 119 2-Core 229 78% 141 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 593 60% 486 Pts	64-Core 712 44% 712 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 229B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1122 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	5.42% Terrible	Lighting 5.4 Reflection 150 Parallax 7.5 4% 54.4 fps	MRender 9.4 Gravity 6.7 Splatting 10.5 7% 8.87 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.42% Great: 6%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$106 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,885 Write 1,436 Mixed 1,483 356% 1,601 MB/s	4K Read 51.8 4K Write 47.8 4K Mixed 50 168% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 772 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 629 438% 561 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 488%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB 71,657 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1TB free Firmware: LGM3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 38.3 Write 58.7 Mixed 59.7 40% 52.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMAA4GS6MJR8N-VK 4x31.8GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	MC Read 25.1 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 23.1 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 29.3 SC Mixed 21.2 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 89.1 45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16