Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX HERO  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateApr 07 '23 at 16:50
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 96
1-Core 134
2-Core 253
91% 161 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 544
61% 477 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.9% Very good
Lighting 98.3
Reflection 109
Parallax 98.8
80% 102 fps
MRender 95.2
Gravity 97.6
Splatting 97.9
80% 96.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB
262GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1095 644 620 577 562 578 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,884
Write 1667
Mixed 694
SusWrite 679
274% 1,231 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 38.6
138% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 616
DQ Write 504
DQ Mixed 526
403% 549 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 184%
Great: 313%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB
126GB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 708 621 618 618 613 614 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 761
Write 754
Mixed 532
SusWrite 632
151% 670 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 38
126% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 520
DQ Write 383
DQ Mixed 463
343% 456 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 128%
Great: 313%
Kingston SHFR200240G 240GB
54GB free
Firmware: 000056RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 108 139 116 111 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 427
Write 359
Mixed 348
SusWrite 133
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 34.8
118% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 138
130% 207 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 96%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
931GB free, PID 0100
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 107 112 108 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 103
Write 101
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 110
112% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 44%
ST1000LM 048-2E7172 1TB
552GB free, PID 8016
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 94 92 80 73 78 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.5% Below average
Read 78.6
Write 96.3
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 81.6
117% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.3
125% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99.1% Outstanding
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 32.9
102% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 27.4
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 54
74% 54 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX HERO Builds (Compare 4,222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,088
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback