Asus TS700-E8-RS8 V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus TS700-E8-RS8 V2  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory249.6 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '23 at 09:43
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 35.3
1-Core 57.4
2-Core 136
40% 76.1 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 478
43% 361 Pts
64-Core 1,393
86% 1,393 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0303B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 192 191 193 191 190 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 298
Write 183
Mixed 194
SusWrite 193
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 7.1
28% 8.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 186 182 179 184 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 141
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 182
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386A8K40BM1-CRC 4x31.8GB
4 of 16 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.9% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.7
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 225
18% 225 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TS700-E8-RS8 V2 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

System: Asus TS700-E8-RS8 V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback