Asus G501JW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G501JW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G501JW
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150724
Uptime8.7 Days
Run DateApr 07 '23 at 09:10
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User KHM-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 63
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 178
62% 111 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 371
41% 324 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 18DD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.86% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 5.3
2% 8.63 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.86%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X300s SATA M.2 128GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2170002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 52 66 70 75 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 388
Write 181
Mixed 148
SusWrite 70
43% 197 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 22.7
86% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 132
122% 193 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$34
26GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 55 60 57 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 58.2
Write 50.5
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 56.9
37% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-078.A00LF Samsung 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 5.9
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G501JW Builds (Compare 176 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G501JW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback