Foxconn A75M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardFoxconn A75M  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110923
Uptime116.8 Days
Run DateApr 07 '23 at 08:19
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3400 APU-$80
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Memory 43.8
1-Core 36.8
2-Core 48.6
28% 43.1 Pts
4-Core 53
8-Core 49.5
7% 51.2 Pts
64-Core 46.2
3% 46.2 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 8496) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.83% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 0.5
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.83%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 3.5 5.2 5.8 6 6.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1.2
Write 1.2
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 5.2
2% 2.08 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Mixed 0
81% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 6GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.63 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A75M Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn A75M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 13% - Very poor Total price: $35
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback