Fujitsu FMVL75GB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu FMVL75GB  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB2EF
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220518
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateApr 07 '23 at 01:43
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i5-1230U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 40.5
1-Core 131
2-Core 196
65% 123 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 488
49% 397 Pts
64-Core 622
38% 622 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1E26 009B) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.27% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 6.4
4% 6.67 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 6.6
7% 8.73 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00B07 256GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7202Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 442 552 679 736 680 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 443
Write 437
Mixed 363
SusWrite 585
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 19.8
68% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 246
175% 225 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 179%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 53.5
MC Mixed 42.8
128% 44.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 34.5
SC Mixed 13.3
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 200
20% 200 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 112%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FMVL75GB Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu FMVL75GB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback