bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2558 x 1318 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '23 at 11:14
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6246R
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 65.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 219
73% 133 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 651
69% 551 Pts
64-Core 639
40% 639 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID RTX8000P-2Q
Nvidia(10DE 1415) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 513.46
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
48.9% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 57.8
49% 59.3 fps
MRender 59.5
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 59.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 193GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 181 187 127 124 200 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 486
Write 434
Mixed 482
SusWrite 166
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 20.2
66% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 403
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 241
210% 314 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 2x16GB
2 of 128 slots used
32GB DIMM DRAM
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 34.7
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback