Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory19.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '23 at 07:35
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 213
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 409
46% 360 Pts
64-Core 473
29% 473 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1AB1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1278
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.6% Average
Lighting 56.6
Reflection 85.8
Parallax 51
46% 64.5 fps
MRender 42.3
Gravity 50.1
Splatting 48.7
39% 47 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$148
564GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1849 2012 2036 1717 840 836 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,305
Write 2,130
Mixed 1,788
SusWrite 1,548
385% 1,693 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 81.8
4K Mixed 61.5
198% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 616
DQ Write 452
DQ Mixed 504
385% 524 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 232%
Great: 372%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
2TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 432 432 435 431 430 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 440
Mixed 416
SusWrite 431
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 38.6
125% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 325
245% 329 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 22.9
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 23.3
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GT Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback