Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory19.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '23 at 07:00
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 209
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 518
55% 440 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1AB1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1693
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43% Average
Lighting 55.9
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 50.1
46% 55.8 fps
MRender 41.8
Gravity 49
Splatting 47.8
38% 46.2 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$148
565GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1613 1697 1707 1741 1753 1767 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,380
Write 1839
Mixed 1,607
SusWrite 1,713
371% 1,635 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 46.7
149% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 510
DQ Write 375
DQ Mixed 446
332% 444 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 226%
Great: 372%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
2TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 420 421 429 431 432 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
90% Outstanding
Read 429
Write 435
Mixed 416
SusWrite 423
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 33.5
106% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 306
230% 309 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.5% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 17.1
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GT Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback