Acer Aspire TC-895

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire TC-895  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-895
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210621
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 06 '23 at 03:39
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 87.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 236
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 738
71% 583 Pts
64-Core 933
58% 933 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
Asus(1043 05E3) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.3.2
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 136
Parallax 231
94% 161 fps
MRender 218
Gravity 124
Splatting 188
145% 177 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 109%
Great: 116%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 108 122 122 82 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 457
Write 308
Mixed 370
SusWrite 105
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 36.3
139% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 23.7
86% 190 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 93%
Nvme WDC WDS960G2G0C- 960GB
820GB free
Firmware: 00WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1269 370 369 377 371 365 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1317
Write 1,782
Mixed 590
SusWrite 520
236% 1,052 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 53.9
177% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 766
DQ Write 579
DQ Mixed 628
482% 657 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 169%
Great: 234%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-UD4-2666 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 26.9
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 23.5
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-895 Builds (Compare 1,174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-895

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback