Asus EX-H110M-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus EX-H110M-V  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '23 at 01:41
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$38
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 190
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 288
38% 282 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
5.52% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 6.8
5% 5.97 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 6
Splatting 10.2
7% 8.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.52%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tigo 120GB 120GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0226A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 15 13 9 4.1 7.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 104%
Skihotar A320 480GB
73GB free
Firmware: HPS1A30C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 222 172 109 150 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 399
Write 378
Mixed 224
SusWrite 172
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 10
83% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 15.9
71% 156 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 85%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
539GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3W0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 11 14 12 16 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.5% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 20.4
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 19.6
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EX-H110M-V Builds (Compare 343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus EX-H110M-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback