Positivo CI581TBW10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPositivo CI581TBW10  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo NB50TH
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '23 at 23:48
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 56.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 225
71% 134 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 592
68% 531 Pts
64-Core 674
42% 674 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Clevo(1558 55A1) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3064
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
27% Poor
Lighting 34.8
Reflection 37.8
Parallax 37.1
28% 36.6 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 25.1
24% 30.3 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CL1-8D128 128GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CT20903 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 186 134 91 86 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 1,264
Write 568
Mixed 153
SusWrite 134
115% 530 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 18.9
100% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 381
DQ Mixed 178
178% 281 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 103%
Great: 135%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
915GB free
Firmware: JU000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 139 139 139 136 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 125
Write 130
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 136
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.6
234% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
27.2% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 8.6
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 5.2
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CI581TBW10 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Positivo CI581TBW10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback