Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop TP1400KA TP1400KA_TP1400KA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop TP1400KA TP1400KA_TP1400KA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TP1400KA
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220505
Uptime16.9 Days
Run DateApr 05 '23 at 22:15
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N6000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Memory 44.6
1-Core 54.1
2-Core 101
38% 66.5 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 142
20% 144 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1D22) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1273
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.67 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 0.4
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-AB1 256GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0SA6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 611 148 196 113 96 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 639
Write 711
Mixed 602
SusWrite 214
122% 541 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 19.5
73% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 260
196% 267 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73%
Great: 193%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.5% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.6
24% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.4
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop TP1400KA TP1400KA_TP1400KA Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop TP1400KA TP1400KA_TP1400KA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback