Packard EasyNote TV43HC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard EasyNote TV43HC  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard VG50_HC_CR
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120824
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 05 '23 at 20:36
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 67.6
1-Core 62
2-Core 101
48% 76.8 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 243
25% 202 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M
Acer(1025 064C) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 2
3% 4.13 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 3.7
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 422 423 437 444 436 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 379
Write 434
Mixed 383
SusWrite 426
92% 405 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 31
105% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 192
162% 234 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
679GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 99 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 86.5
Write 97.5
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 98.8
62% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 14.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 10.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TV43HC Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TV43HC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback