Asus ROG STRIX B760-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 121%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B760-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221103
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 05 '23 at 12:47
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900-$489
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Memory 74.9
1-Core 223
2-Core 445
126% 247 Pts
4-Core 890
8-Core 1,710
154% 1,300 Pts
64-Core 3,878
240% 3,878 Pts
Poor: 119%
This bench: 121%
Great: 129%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 531.41
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 140
Reflection 157
Parallax 153
114% 150 fps
Gravity 158
Splatting 109
115% 133 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 392 291 422 421 433 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 377
Mixed 379
SusWrite 388
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 31
161% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 165
170% 280 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 105%
Great: 111%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
680GB free
Firmware: M6CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 415 48 37 38 216 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 496
Write 434
Mixed 409
SusWrite 200
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 24.5
139% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 29.9
76% 155 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 99%
WD WD80EAZZ-00BKLB0 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 191 192 195 193 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 128
Mixed 111
SusWrite 192
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.1
365% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 112%
Great: 117%
USB 3.0 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 154 155 157 156 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 150
Write 148
Mixed 144
SusWrite 156
111% 149 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.1
451% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 113%
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55
366GB free
Firmware: SM12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 108 111 112 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 112
Write 104
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 111
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 63%
WD Elements 2TB
2TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 58.2
Write 28.2
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 38.9
48% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
85% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6000C40 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
136% Outstanding
MC Read 53.2
MC Write 51.6
MC Mixed 50.4
148% 51.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 49.6
SC Mixed 28.6
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 137%
This bench: 136%
Great: 197%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B760-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 871 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B760-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $1,280
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback