Lenovo 20HGS0XV00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics66.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20HGS0XV00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HGS0XV00
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '23 at 18:47
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 64.9
1-Core 78
2-Core 134
54% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 193
26% 191 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.14043.7000
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.1% Good
Lighting 84.5
Reflection 103
Parallax 114
69% 100 fps
MRender 72.6
Gravity 93.8
Splatting 61.3
61% 75.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 85%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L7QCXY7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 723 632 636 634 633 628 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,313
Write 748
Mixed 662
SusWrite 648
187% 842 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 37.3
113% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 439
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 301
234% 325 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 143%
Great: 259%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B2 Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.5
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 10.2
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20HGS0XV00 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20HGS0XV00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback