Medion X682X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion X682X  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION X682X
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '23 at 16:43
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 44.4
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 125
45% 80.1 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 274
32% 251 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
MSI(1462 10CB) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2857
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.94% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.63 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.94%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3512G 512GB
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 373 392 380 376 380 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 376
Write 349
Mixed 295
SusWrite 381
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 22.6
72% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 274
209% 280 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 119%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
395GB free
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 208 118 44 77 151 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.8% Below average
Read 174
Write 167
Mixed 159
SusWrite 134
36% 159 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 12.4
42% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 85.2
DQ Mixed 41.5
47% 80.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR8C-H9 Kingston 99U5428-046.A00LF HMT451S6MFR8C-H9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
22.2% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7.1
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 5
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X682X Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Medion X682X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $547Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback