Asrock H510M-HVS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H510M-HVS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '23 at 15:53
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G6400
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 179
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 282
35% 269 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
ASRock(1849 9BA8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
2.28% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 3.6
2% 3.1 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.28%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 128GB 128GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 258 376 330 333 336 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 442
Write 397
Mixed 373
SusWrite 320
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 23.6
106% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 37.5
77% 149 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Avant W6451U66J7240ND 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.7% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 11.1
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 13.2
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H510M-HVS R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock H510M-HVS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $291
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback