ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z6 G4 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 92% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	95.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	323% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z6 G4 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 81C6
Memory	115 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20221013
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '23 at 07:55
Run Duration	220 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon Gold 6248 11 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPU0, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 71.6 1-Core 109 2-Core 209 72% 130 Pts	4-Core 361 8-Core 759 66% 560 Pts	64-Core 2,266 140% 2,266 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 9,173 User benchmarks, average bench 98% HP(103C 12A0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.48 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	95.9% Outstanding	Lighting 115 Reflection 134 Parallax 119 94% 123 fps	MRender 164 Gravity 98.7 Splatting 111 100% 125 fps
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 102%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 54,201 User benchmarks, average bench 449% 724GB free (System drive) Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2226 2129 2109 2115 2112 2106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	323% Outstanding	Read 1,995 Write 2,021 Mixed 1,795 SusWrite 2,133 448% 1,986 MB/s	4K Read 56.2 4K Write 167 4K Mixed 64.8 256% 95.9 MB/s	DQ Read 926 DQ Write 650 DQ Mixed 822 605% 799 MB/s
Poor: 249% ↑ This bench: 323% Great: 623%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 54,201 User benchmarks, average bench 449% 862GB free Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2033 2030 2047 2031 2029 2024 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	332% Outstanding	Read 2,089 Write 2,080 Mixed 1,872 SusWrite 2,032 455% 2,018 MB/s	4K Read 60.1 4K Write 169 4K Mixed 74.5 276% 101 MB/s	DQ Read 991 DQ Write 791 DQ Mixed 887 665% 890 MB/s
Poor: 249% ↑ This bench: 332% Great: 623%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 418GB free Firmware: 1A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 148 145 147 145 147 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Read 165 Write 148 Mixed 119 SusWrite 146 107% 145 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 348GB free Firmware: 1A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 98 99 99 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Read 132 Write 137 Mixed 120 SusWrite 98.3 91% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 242% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G9E2 4x31.8GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 4 of 6 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	126% Outstanding	MC Read 46.6 MC Write 64.4 MC Mixed 44.8 148% 51.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 10.8 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 97.6 41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 127%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Z6 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 48%

Yacht

System: HP Z6 G4 Workstation

CPU
Xeon Silver 4114IntelBench 65%, 539 samples	61x
Xeon Silver 4108IntelBench 60%, 331 samples	61x
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 41081stBench 59%, 156 samples	28x

GPU
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	92x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	48x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	44x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 2,013 samples	24x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	21x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	20x

RAM
M393A2K40BB2-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 57%, 231 samples	19x
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 410 samples	14x
HMA82GR7AFR4N-VK 4x16GBHynixBench 94%, 150 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback