HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics40.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory46.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateApr 04 '23 at 04:28
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 51.8
2-Core 104
48% 76.1 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 488
44% 370 Pts
64-Core 1,205
75% 1,205 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.9% Average
Lighting 49.6
Reflection 52.1
Parallax 47.9
40% 49.9 fps
MRender 47.4
Gravity 50.4
Splatting 53.6
42% 50.5 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 42%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDSC2BB800G4I 800GB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: NB37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 387 375 387 398 398 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.3% Very good
Read 375
Write 380
Mixed 300
SusWrite 388
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 22.1
73% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 228
169% 223 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GR7BFR4A-PB 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.6% Very good
MC Read 36
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 26.4
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.4
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,769 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback