Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FAC_X512FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FAC_X512FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FAC
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210126
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateApr 03 '23 at 20:52
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 132
58% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 182
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1CD1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 4
Parallax 6.4
4% 4.97 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 1
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 14 218 102 56 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 1,214
Write 672
Mixed 578
SusWrite 148
144% 653 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 44
146% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 323
236% 308 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 116%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 859B CB4GS2666.C8FT 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
62.4% Good
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 20.7
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 18.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FAC_X512FA Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FAC_X512FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback