Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '17 at 01:43
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 97.4
1-Core 157
2-Core 315
104% 190 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 925
97% 776 Pts
64-Core 912
56% 912 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 107%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.11.4
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Lighting 73.4
Reflection 68.1
Parallax 86.3
60% 75.9 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 67.7
Splatting 56.1
51% 63.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
173GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 2,865
Write 1,273
Mixed 1,510
413% 1,882 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 53.5
250% 93.5 MB/s
DQ Read 618
DQ Write 445
DQ Mixed 224
251% 429 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 291%
Great: 236%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,780
Write 1,242
Mixed 1,451
400% 1,824 MB/s
4K Read 62.4
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 39.3
232% 88.5 MB/s
DQ Read 65
DQ Write 429
DQ Mixed 213
174% 236 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 266%
Great: 236%
StoreJet Transcend 500GB
124GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 87.5
Write 86.2
Mixed 74.7
106% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 0.86
4K Mixed 0.19
37% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 44%
Patriot Memory 32GB
29GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 249
Write 46.7
Mixed 59.1
111% 118 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
39% 3.39 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 51%
Patriot Memory 32GB
29GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 43.2
Write 36.4
Mixed 28.5
44% 36 MB/s
4K Read 9.59
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.01
37% 3.21 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3193 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 40.5
MC Mixed 29.7
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 43.2
SC Mixed 31.3
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 48.8
82% 48.8 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback