Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	29.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2234 68 User benchmarks, average bench 87% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Memory 44.8 1-Core 64.8 2-Core 136 45% 82 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 364 36% 296 Pts	64-Core 394 24% 394 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKB240G8 240GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1120 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 245 102 108 107 195 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.4% Poor	Read 176 Write 182 Mixed 161 SusWrite 150 38% 167 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 15.7 4K Mixed 10.4 32% 11 MB/s	DQ Read 37.8 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 42.1 40% 60.7 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 85%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 7.5TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 7TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 232 102 129 222 113 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 261 Write 157 Mixed 50.1 SusWrite 149 112% 154 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.5 328% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 164%
WD My Book 1140 3TB 6,710 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 2TB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 38 23 26 26 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 50.5 Write 31.1 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 29.9 43% 34.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.9 70% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965684-013.A00G 2x8GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	42.4% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 15.7 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 6 15% 5.13 GB/s	Latency 181 22% 181 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 106%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16