Asus A88X-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus A88X-PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '23 at 22:49
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 71.6
1-Core 38.6
2-Core 74.6
41% 61.6 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 149
18% 138 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.1% Above average
Lighting 66.4
Reflection 71.4
Parallax 64.8
54% 67.5 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 69.1
Splatting 64.6
54% 66.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 250GB SSD
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900301
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 305 351 315 265 294 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 372
Write 293
Mixed 377
SusWrite 299
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 31.3
107% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 176
138% 192 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMY8GX3M2A2133C11 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
32.9% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 13.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 10.3
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88X-PRO Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88X-PRO - $278

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $441
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback